0.03/0.13	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.13	% Command    : run_vampire %s %d THM
0.12/0.34	% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
0.12/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.34	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.12/0.34	% WCLimit    : 180
0.12/0.34	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 08:14:09 EDT 2024
0.12/0.34	% CPUTime    : 
0.12/0.36	This is a THF_ problem
0.12/0.36	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.12/0.37	Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire_ho --cores 7 --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bBIAp1ioPa/E---3.1_23045.p -m 16384 -t 180
0.23/0.39	% (23272)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_23045 for (1799ds/4Mi)
0.23/0.39	% (23271)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_23045 for (1799ds/183Mi)
0.23/0.39	% (23273)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_23045 for (1799ds/27Mi)
0.23/0.39	% (23275)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_23045 for (1799ds/2Mi)
0.23/0.39	% (23274)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_23045 for (1799ds/2Mi)
0.23/0.39	% (23277)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_23045 for (1799ds/18Mi)
0.23/0.39	% (23276)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on E---3.1_23045 for (1799ds/275Mi)
0.23/0.39	% (23274)Instruction limit reached!
0.23/0.39	% (23274)------------------------------
0.23/0.39	% (23274)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.23/0.39	% (23274)Termination reason: Unknown
0.23/0.39	% (23274)Termination phase: shuffling
0.23/0.39	
0.23/0.39	% (23274)Memory used [KB]: 1023
0.23/0.39	% (23274)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
0.23/0.39	% (23274)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
0.23/0.39	% (23274)------------------------------
0.23/0.39	% (23274)------------------------------
0.23/0.39	% (23275)Instruction limit reached!
0.23/0.39	% (23275)------------------------------
0.23/0.39	% (23275)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.23/0.39	% (23275)Termination reason: Unknown
0.23/0.39	% (23275)Termination phase: shuffling
0.23/0.39	
0.23/0.39	% (23275)Memory used [KB]: 1023
0.23/0.39	% (23275)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
0.23/0.39	% (23275)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
0.23/0.39	% (23275)------------------------------
0.23/0.39	% (23275)------------------------------
0.23/0.40	% (23272)Instruction limit reached!
0.23/0.40	% (23272)------------------------------
0.23/0.40	% (23272)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.23/0.40	% (23272)Termination reason: Unknown
0.23/0.40	% (23272)Termination phase: Property scanning
0.23/0.40	
0.23/0.40	% (23272)Memory used [KB]: 1023
0.23/0.40	% (23272)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
0.23/0.40	% (23272)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.23/0.40	% (23272)------------------------------
0.23/0.40	% (23272)------------------------------
0.23/0.40	% (23276)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.23/0.40	% (23276)------------------------------
0.23/0.40	% (23276)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.23/0.40	% (23276)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
0.23/0.40	
0.23/0.40	
0.23/0.40	% (23276)Memory used [KB]: 5500
0.23/0.40	% (23276)Time elapsed: 0.006 s
0.23/0.40	% (23276)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
0.23/0.40	% (23276)------------------------------
0.23/0.40	% (23276)------------------------------
0.23/0.41	% (23277)Instruction limit reached!
0.23/0.41	% (23277)------------------------------
0.23/0.41	% (23277)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.23/0.41	% (23277)Termination reason: Unknown
0.23/0.41	% (23277)Termination phase: Saturation
0.23/0.41	
0.23/0.41	% (23277)Memory used [KB]: 5628
0.23/0.41	% (23277)Time elapsed: 0.014 s
0.23/0.41	% (23277)Instructions burned: 18 (million)
0.23/0.41	% (23277)------------------------------
0.23/0.41	% (23277)------------------------------
0.23/0.41	% (23271)First to succeed.
0.23/0.41	% (23271)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
0.23/0.41	% SZS status Theorem for E---3.1_23045
0.23/0.41	% SZS output start Proof for E---3.1_23045
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_0, type, num: $tType).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_1, type, agent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_3, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiioIiioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_4, type, domain_THFTYPE_IIiooIiioI: ($i > $o > $o) > $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_5, type, domain_THFTYPE_IiiioI: $i > $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_7, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_8, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIIiioIIiioIoIioI: (($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o) > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_9, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_10, type, instance_THFTYPE_IIiooIioI: ($i > $o > $o) > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_11, type, instance_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_12, type, knows_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_29, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_30, type, member_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_35, type, range_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_36, type, relatedInternalConcept_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_37, type, subclass_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_38, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIiioIioI: ($i > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_39, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IIioIIioIoI: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_40, type, subrelation_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_50, type, sK0: $i > $i).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_51, type, sK1: $i > $i).
0.23/0.41	thf(func_def_53, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
0.23/0.41	thf(f275,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  $false),
0.23/0.41	  inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f274,f232])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f232,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f231])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f231,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != $true) | ($true != $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f186,f230])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f230,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ $true) = $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(boolean_simplification,[],[f220])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f220,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f59])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f59,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f58])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f58,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i))),
0.23/0.41	  inference(rectify,[],[f2])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f2,axiom,(
0.23/0.41	  (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (lChris_THFTYPE_i = lChris_THFTYPE_i))),
0.23/0.41	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bBIAp1ioPa/E---3.1_23045.p',ax_016)).
0.23/0.41	thf(f186,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) != $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f150])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f150,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) != $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(flattening,[],[f121])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f121,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ~((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)) = $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f120])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f120,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
0.23/0.41	  inference(rectify,[],[f8])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f8,negated_conjecture,(
0.23/0.41	  ~(knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
0.23/0.41	  inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f7])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f7,conjecture,(
0.23/0.41	  (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))),
0.23/0.41	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bBIAp1ioPa/E---3.1_23045.p',con)).
0.23/0.41	thf(f274,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f271])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f271,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ($false = $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(superposition,[],[f247,f222])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f222,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f91])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f91,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f90])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f90,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(rectify,[],[f21])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f21,axiom,(
0.23/0.41	  (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)),
0.23/0.41	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bBIAp1ioPa/E---3.1_23045.p',ax_007)).
0.23/0.41	thf(f247,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (($false = (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1)) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true)) )),
0.23/0.41	  inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f246,f232])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f246,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1) = $true) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) | ($false = (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1))) )),
0.23/0.41	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f245])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f245,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) | (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X1) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X1)) = $true)) )),
0.23/0.41	  inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f244])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f244,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ( ! [X1 : $i] : (((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true) | (((^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))) @ X1) = $true)) )),
0.23/0.41	  inference(pi_clausification,[],[f238])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f238,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ($true = (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) | ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) = $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[],[f237])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f237,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0)))))),
0.23/0.41	  inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f236])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f236,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i) != (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) | ($true != $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(constrained_superposition,[],[f186,f221])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f221,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) = $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f95])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f95,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  ((knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ (!! @ $i @ (^[Y0 : $i]: ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ Y0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ Y0))))) = $true)),
0.23/0.41	  inference(fool_elimination,[],[f94])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f94,plain,(
0.23/0.41	  (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ ! [X0] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X0) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X0)))),
0.23/0.41	  inference(rectify,[],[f28])).
0.23/0.41	thf(f28,axiom,(
0.23/0.41	  (knows_THFTYPE_IiooI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ ! [X7] : ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lMary_THFTYPE_i @ X7) => (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ X7)))),
0.23/0.41	  file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.bBIAp1ioPa/E---3.1_23045.p',ax_018)).
0.23/0.41	% SZS output end Proof for E---3.1_23045
0.23/0.41	% (23271)------------------------------
0.23/0.41	% (23271)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 11aac991b on 2023-10-04 16:26:07 +0200)
0.23/0.41	% (23271)Termination reason: Refutation
0.23/0.41	
0.23/0.41	% (23271)Memory used [KB]: 5756
0.23/0.41	% (23271)Time elapsed: 0.017 s
0.23/0.41	% (23271)Instructions burned: 20 (million)
0.23/0.41	% (23271)------------------------------
0.23/0.41	% (23271)------------------------------
0.23/0.41	% (23264)Success in time 0.033 s
0.23/0.41	EOF